Updates from RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Tom Goskar 9:18 pm on 23 February, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: analysis, , illumination dome, imaging, PTM, RTI, surface detail   

    Polynomial Texture Mapping for Archaeologists 

    This month sees the publication of an article written by myself and Dr Graeme Earl from the University of Southampton’s Archaeological Computing Research Group entitled “Polynomial Texture Mapping for Archaeologists” in the March/April edition of British Archaeology magazine.

    Polynomial Texture Mapping (PTM) is a technique that uses ordinary digital photography equipment alongside directional lighting. It produces images that can be lit from any direction, as if you had the real object in front of you. It is an excellent technique for analysing fine details on surfaces, something that has particular utility in archaeology.

    Setting up the camera

    The full text will be available online after the next edition of BA comes out.

    The photo above is of the PTM illumination dome which I designed and built at Wessex Archaeology. You can see more details about the dome in my building a PTM illumination dome Flickr set. I have much more to say about PTM, so stay tuned.

    Find out more about the Wessex Archaeology PTM rig and see interactive examples.

     
  • Tom Goskar 9:23 pm on 27 December, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: archive, British Library, web archive   

    British Library to archive UK websites 

    Finally, the British Library has been granted the necessary legal powers to archive websites based in the UK (with .uk domain names and others hosted in the UK). These powers are similar to those that require every publisher in the UK to provide copies of printed publications to the BL.

    An increasing amount of information is only published online, and as web pages change or are deleted, we are losing an important record of our history and culture.

    Head over to the Guardian to read more.

     
  • Tom Goskar 10:36 pm on 24 November, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Digitising, digitizing, , Iraq,   

    Google plans to digitise the Iraq National Museum’s collections 

    Putting aside any cynicism about publicity stunts, it is interesting to see Google announce that they are ‘digitising’ the collections of the National Museum of Iraq.

    The story on Reuters claims that 14,000 photos of the artefacts will be published online in early 2010.

    “I can think of no better use of our time and our resources to make the images and ideas from your civilization, from the very beginning of time, available to a billion people worldwide,” Google CEO Eric Schmidt said at a news conference at the Baghdad museum.

    “Most American companies are not yet operating in Iraq, and we would like to show that it’s possible to do business in Iraq, that Iraq is an important market that will grow quickly, that it’s sufficiently stable,” he added.

    Ah, so the latter quote shows some of the politics involved, but recording, cataloguing and making freely available such an important collection is surely a good thing.

    The questions that arise from this news are numerous, and, just to add to the speculation, ReadWriteWeb quote Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt as saying that there will be “a few surprises“.

    Will Google be releasing the raw data? Will it be structured? Are Google going to release a collections management system? Will they work closely with other museums?

    Definitely one to watch.

     
    • Frankie Roberto 4:53 pm on 25 November, 2009 Permalink

      Gosh, yes, how interesting!

      Wonder if Google will show us how museum digitisation is really done. Or whether it’ll end up a relative simple Google Scholar/Books style affair.

    • Martin Greaney 2:55 pm on 11 December, 2009 Permalink

      Google usually come up with stuff that’s easy to navigate and incredibly useful, though it’ll be interesting to see how accessible it becomes. Their stuff is usually free, but I hope the Baghdad scans etc will be open too.

    • Peter Edwell 5:08 am on 22 January, 2010 Permalink

      Looking forward to this but will virtual Iraq be the only Iraq we know?

  • Tom Goskar 10:19 pm on 5 October, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: David Dawson, Devizes, Google Books, Wiltshire   

    Wiltshire Heritage Museum library and Google Books 

    Since the appointment of David Dawson as Director of Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society and Wiltshire Heritage Museum in April 2008, the organisation have not rested on their laurels. The Museum’s library has just gone online via Google Books, and they are possibly the first organisation in the world to do it this way.

    The Wiltshire Heritage Museum library has just gone online with a digital library created in just 5 months using the controversial Google Books service.

    The Library has been collecting books about the history, environment and archaeology of Wiltshire for over 150 years, and has many rare and important books in its collection of over 8000 volumes. Until now, the idea of getting the library online has been only a dream for librarian Dr Lorna Haycock. Without Google, it would have cost tens of thousands of pounds, buying a computer system, exhaustive data entry and only a few of the books could have been scanned electronically.

    Museum Director, David Dawson explained that the controversial Google Books service has a ‘My Library’ facility, where you can simply click on a book that you have found on Google Books, and then add it to your own digital library. Work began in May this year to catalogue the entire library, using Google Books, and over 5,000 books have now been recorded. Many of them have already been digitised, and the full text of many can be searched online. He commented “as far as we know, we are the first library in the world to have created a digital library using the Google Books service. As an independent charity, we simply couldn’t afford to get our library online until Google Books gave us this fantastic opportunity to enable people to carry out their research online.”

    The digital library has now been launched through the museum website – http://www.wiltshireheritage.org.uk. Everyone can now browse and search the library online – finding books that contain detailed information about where they live, or about the history of their family. Director David Dawson explains “people can then visit our library to read the real books, discovering the wealth of material that we have in our fantastic library”.

    While they have not digitised the text from their books, this is a fantastic start, and clever thinking. Most of their titles can now be searched, and thanks to the Google Books digitisation programme (the ‘controversial‘ part) the content of many out-of-copyright titles can be searched or downloaded as part of the Google Books Library Project.

    Visit the Wiltshire Heritage Museum Library to find out more.

    And as an aside, I ought to mention the Wiltshire Heritage Museum’s YouTube channel, which, at the time of writing, does not have many views on its videos. Their short films are of excellent quality, professionally produced, and really watchable – just the right length, and many of them featuring Wiltshire’s most famous archaeologist – Time Team/Wessex Archaeology’s Phil Harding, who is no stranger to being in front of the camera. Go there at once, and watch some of them! Or better still, visit the museum – something I’ve shamefully yet to do myself!

    (note to self, visit Wiltshire Heritage Museum!)

     
  • Tom Goskar 11:23 am on 31 July, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , 3D laser scanning, , , , point clouds   

    Building Rome in a Day 

    The billions of photos taken in cities across the world and uploaded to places like Flickr, Photobucket et al might suddenly have a very interesting use. The University of Washington are experimenting with the creation of 3D “point clouds” similar to those created by terrestrial laser scanners, from downloaded images.

    By sourcing images and applying the principles of photogrammetry and distributed computing, the results are very impressive. They aren’t going to rival laser scanners just yet, but the animations on the Building Rome in a Day project website are impressive, and show the huge potential of this approach.

    Entering the search term Rome on Flickr returns more than two million photographs. This collection represents an increasingly complete photographic record of the city, capturing every popular site, facade, interior, fountain, sculpture, painting, cafe, and so forth. It also offers us an unprecedented opportunity to richly capture, explore and study the three dimensional shape of the city.

    This particular project aims to create “sparse point clouds” to give a 3D overview of the layout of a city, and has interesting potential for interacting with and exploring a place virtually. They are running a parallel project investigating dense point clouds which looks promising, but probably won’t see any popular use for a long time due to the massive amount of processing and data storage involved (dense 3D point clouds and meshes are huge datasets).

    The University of Washington project is similar to Microsoft’s Photosynth project. But the difference is that with Photosynth, users have to manually create “synths” by uploading photos of a particular place. Photosynth does not allow users to tap into the millions of other images out there, which moves me to my next point.

    What about the copyright implications of crowd-sourced photos? Even if just using Creative Commons licensed images, imagine what the “attribution” page would look like if hundreds of thousands of images have been used from potentially tens of thousands of photographers. I’ll be interested to see how they deal with that side of things.

    But overall, this is an exciting development. There is huge potential for cultural heritage applications, especially in the areas of survey and interpretation. I will be following this project very closely.

     
    • Bill Hume 11:27 am on 28 September, 2009 Permalink

      Cool…undoubtedly and no doubt usefull in a global recording sense. It does however remind me of Photosynth in that the point clouds are unobtainable to us mere mortals. I had hoped for a system like ’synth where I could input photographs and have a point cloud constructed from them. Yes I know ’synth does that, but there is no mechanism for obtaining the point cloud data. It’s so frustrating.
      See
      http://photosynth.net/view.aspx?cid=40f024dd-d24e-4d97-a530-501faefc639f
      It’s a synth of a standing stone I made last year. I love the point cloud, I can see it, but can’t obtain it as a data set. Let’s hope someone at Microsoft sees the real value of Photosynth soon.
      Bill Hume.

    • patrick 4:12 pm on 6 November, 2009 Permalink

      Hello:
      I am a 3d illustrator who specializes in renderings of events historical in nature.When I read your post with the subject “3d” it natural got my attention. Reading your post regarding “Building Rome in a day” I couldn’t help but think of the Google Earth project “Ancient Rome in 3d” and thought that may be something you would be interested in. I like your blog, some of the information I find quite interesting.

    • Bill Hume 11:58 pm on 7 March, 2010 Permalink

      There is now a free prog. which allows the simple extraction of point cloud data from Photosynth.

      http://pspcexporter.codeplex.com/

      Works an absolute treat. Only problem I have now is that I’m unable to get Meshlab to convert the point cloud to a mesh. Having never worked with 3D (in a computing sense), I forsee a steep and painful learning curve ahead.
      Worth trying it out. Just paste the url of my synth of the standing stone (above), into the appropriate box and hit go…….it really is that simple.
      Point cloud may be viewed in meshlab……I was surprised how much of the field boundaries were there, you need to zoom in on the stone itself.
      Hope this of interest to you,
      Bill Hume.

    • Tom Goskar 1:59 pm on 8 March, 2010 Permalink

      Thanks for the update, Bill. I will certainly try it out – the ‘old’ way of intercepting the data and converting the binary file was a lot of hassle.

      Unfortunately the examples I tried (mainly Stonehenge related) had terrible point clouds, so at least trying different ones will now be less painful (especially if the resultant point cloud is poor too!).

      Cheers,

      Tom

  • Tom Goskar 1:36 pm on 4 June, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Swindon   

    A new home for the Museum of Computing 

    The UK’s Museum of Computing has secured new premises situated in Swindon’s town centre. Thanks to a 3 year lease donated by Swindon Borough Council, the museum is due to re-open in July.

    Read more about the Museum of Computing reopening on Culture24 or their own press release for more background on the museum.

    Friday 23rd May 2009 – We are delighted to announce that the Museum will be reopening in July 2009 in Swindon town centre. Our volunteers are now hard at working transforming what was previously retail units into one of the most exciting and original venues in Swindon. The museum will be located at 6-7 Theatre Square, an section of the town that has been designated a cultural area in Swindons regeneration plan. We are very grateful to Swindon Borough Council for making these premises available and to all the people who have worked so hard to make this happen.

     
  • Tom Goskar 2:55 pm on 22 April, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , archaeopix, , photographs,   

    Archaeopix: a Creative Commons archaeology photo search tool 

    Alun Salt and I have been working on a new website to help simplify the process of finding archaeology and heritage-related photos that have a Creative Commons license attached to them.

    Without further ado, introducing… Archaeopix!

    Archaeopix homepage

    The homepage features a photo of the day, which we hope to update daily. Clicking “Search” on the navigation bar takes you to the tool where you can look for CC licensed images which have been posted to a hand-picked series of groups and accounts on Flickr:

    Archaeopix search results

    This is what Alun has to say about the search tool:

    The clever bit is the search page.

    Searching Flickr can be hit ‘n’ miss. Generally if you want to use a photo for a blog or educational handout and you need it quickly, it needs to be licensed under a creative commons licence. You can search on Flickr for cc-licensed photos, but a search for “Rome” will bring up everything with Rome in it. Groups are handy because they’re themed. So you could search the Archaeology group for Rome. The problem then is that you’ll find a lot of ©opyright photos. You really need a group which is all cc-licensed. Chiron is a good example of that. However Chiron’s strength is that it focuses on the classical world, which means you won’t find prehistoric Europe in it, or anything Mayan. This is where Archaeopix search comes in.

    Head over to Alun’s Archaeoastronomy blog to read more about Archaeopix.

    Link: Archaeopix

     
  • Tom Goskar 3:29 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: community, , , improvements, , suggestions,   

    Creative Spaces – some more thoughts 

    It’s been an interesting day so far on the Museums Computer Group email list. The debate on Creative Spaces has been fast-paced with passion, criticism and defence. I won’t reiterate exactly what has been said, as you could catch up on the threads in the list archive, but I have had some more thoughts that I wish to share.

    Despite the criticism from some of the more vocal members of the museum technology community, I stand by my previous post in that I can’t help but like the idea of the Creative Spaces project.

    Why will people like it?

    I think people (i.e. ‘normal’ users, not museums professionals per se) will like it because:

    • It encourages users to interact with the museum spaces and objects within
    • It fosters a sense of connection with the museum, which, in my unscientific experience, people like
    • It is an online space endorsed by the museums and galleries themselves, so it’s ’safe’
    • You are free to do what you like on the site – sign up to groups, create notebooks about things you find interesting, comment on other notebooks and items within, etc.

    It will, of course, only ‘work’ if a genuine community builds up around and within the website. Getting people to use it shouldn’t be a problem. I don’t know the exact visitor numbers for the nine museums involved with the pilot, but it’s certainly in the millions. Something as simplistic as a sign reading “Interact with this museum online. Share your experiences on Creative Spaces.”, displayed in prominent physical as well as virtual spaces ought to do the job. Maybe a place to have an experiment with QR codes too.

    Homepage

    Much of the criticism (e.g. Mike Ellis, New Curator) about Creative Spaces is that people have, when faced with the homepage for the first time, not known what to do, or how it will benefit them. This is generally true. It’s hard to design the perfect homepage (believe me, I know!), but I can suggest some improvements.

    creative-spaces-welcome

    Firstly, we need people to know immediately what the site is all about. Currently we have: “Connecting with your favourite Museums! Creative Spaces connects you with nine UK national museums and galleries allowing you to explore their collections, find like-minded people and create your own content.”

    Maybe it could be ““Interact with museums and galleries. Upload your own experiences. Search the collections of 9 museums. Connect with like-minded people. Expand your visit online.” This explains why I might want to create an account and get involved – I don’t want to “create my own content”, I want to upload my stuff to share!

    Those big buttons could do with a very short description (click to see a larger version):

    Creative Spaces Buttons 

    (as I write this, Frankie has written echoed some of my ideas, and had some great new ones)

    Should Notebooks be called Notebooks? They’re more like your own collection. Whichever way it is done, I do think that it could be a tad clearer.

    URLs

    However, on the sign, you would have to display a URL. It would make sense to make this a single, memorable URL. I confess to being somewhat confused as to why there are so many URLs – one for each participating insitution:

    British Museum http://bm.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    Imperial War Museum http://iwm.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    National Portrait Gallery http://npg.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    Natural History Museum http://nhm.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    Royal Armouries http://ram.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    Sir John Soane’s Museum http://sjs.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    TATE http://tate.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    The Wallace Collection http://twc.nmolp.org/creativespaces/
    V&A Museum http://vna.nmolp.org/creativespaces/

     The only difference I can see when looking at these sites is the “Popular collection items” display. Perhaps a gateway page with a single URL would be an option, say at creativespaces.info (which is available, and easy to remember)? You could select which museum you wanted to see popular items from. There are many ways of doing this – I hope the stakeholders explore some of them.

    Search

    As I have mentioned elsewhere, I did find the search facility to be somewhat lacking. It’s great for casually browsing objects by keyword, but like many people, once you can see the power of a cross-collection search that previously (to the best of my knowledge) didn’t exist, I want more.

    I found it very hard to locate objects that have an Iron Age date, for example. If I was to use this in an educational context I’d like to see a few more options in the search, such as provenance, period, and location.

    In the search results, clicking “View larger image” opens a new browser window showing the result from the institution’s own website, which in turn often requires another click to view a larger version. If this could be integrated in a better way, that would be great (but it’s a start). Maybe using a “lightbox” style effect (using jQuery, for example) to float the detail page over Creative Spaces might make it seem slightly better integrated?

    RSS

    I’d like to see personalised RSS feeds for notebooks and groups. This would allow me, as a slightly more tech-savvy user, to display my Creative Spaces content elsewhere, such as here on Past Thinking, or even in Facebook.

    Beta & User Help Forums

    If the site is going to be in “beta”, it ought to be described somewhere on the site what this means in layman’s terms. Frankie Roberto suggested needs to be some kind of help forum (like GetSatisfaction). This should be separate from the “Groups” (as it wouldn’t be about museum/gallery content, but about the website itself), that is looked after by the Creative Spaces staff. They can listen to suggestions, and inform people of forthcoming changes. Communication needs to work both ways if there is a community involved.

    Conclusion

    Creative Spaces is in beta. Things will change as more people use the service, and those who designed it learn how it is used, and where its limitations lie. Any amount of user testing is no match for thousands of people trying to actually use it. It’s the approach Flickr took, and some radical changes have occurred there too over the years (for good or for bad – you can’t please everybody). They listened to their users.

    With a better homepage, I think this could really work. Once that is improved, and people can see straight away why they would want to use Creative Spaces, it will gain more users, and begin the evolution of the beta site into a strong, vibrant community of, as the BBC put it “Museum lovers”.

    Here’s to its success!

    [Update] Mike Ellis’s post on his Electronic Museum blog has a really good conversation going on in the comments. It’s really worth heading over there to catch up on who’s saying what.

     
    • Pete NewCurator 4:01 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      My criticism wasn’t that people wouldn’t know what to do, it’s that there’s nothing to it. You reasons for why people would like it could be done on the each of the museum’s own website and any bookmarking tool.

      In fact, I think this could be knocked up in ning.com in an afternoon.

      Alright, it’s still in Beta. But Beta is supposed to show a rough version with bugs to iron out. Not something so thin it’s not going to tell you where it’s going.

      When something worth mentioning happens on Creative Spaces, I’ll talk about it. But think about the fanfare this has got. This has been released far too early.

    • Tom Goskar 4:17 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      Hi Pete,

      Thanks for your comment.

      It’s true that each museum could do the same on their own sites, but that’s limiting when you want to view collections beyond the bounds of a single institution. Many people may also visit a number of museums in one day, or over time, and want to aggregate stuff together. Not just saving favourite objects, but photos, text, whatever. A more reflexive approach, as it where. That’s how I see it anyway.

      True – much of the functionality could be created in Ning in a few hours. But who has control over that data? How safe would it be with Ning? How could you get data back out in a useable, controlled form? How can you control how well it will perform if the service gets very popular? You couldn’t do the federated search in Ning.

      There are a lot of improvements to be made, that’s for sure. I’ve just uploaded some images into a Notebook and it looks rather ugly (especially how it shows the larger image). But I expect that kind of thing to change from user feedback. Or at least, I hope it will ;-)

      I do think that it’s newsworthy, as it is a start. I haven’t seen anything directly museum/gallery-related like this before. I only hope that there is some of the £1.5m left to make improvements, and that some of the constructive criticism levied by members of the museum community (and indeed, early users) will be taken onboard.

      We will have to, as they say, watch this Creative Space (har, har).

    • Mia 4:24 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      I think it’s a tough gig for the staff on Creative Spaces – I suspect a lot of the criticism actually relates to the project structures they inherited, not the implementation choices open to them. But the people who write those project bids aren’t around in these museum tech spaces to hear the comments – so who’s left to take responsibility for them?

      ‘beta’ as final bug fixes is a slightly outdated idea that doesn’t allow for open iterations – having a beta like this is a step closer to an agile model that allows for deep change, not just a thin layer of beta testing that can only poke around on the surface or fix bugs.

      I dunno, I’m still thinking through it all. Museum projects need to be more user-centred, and this is both a step forward (even if the geeks have trouble imagining it being useful for other people) and a step backwards (because it’s the same old top-heavy, old-fashioned project structure based around institutional needs).

    • Pete NewCurator 6:53 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      “limiting when you want to view collections beyond the bounds of a single institution.”

      As I proved, you could do it all on Google.

      http://newcurator.com/2009/03/how-to-make-creative-spaces-in-5-minutes/

    • Andrew Larcombe 7:57 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      ‘fraid I’m with Pete on this one.

      It doesn’t actually appear to *do* much apart from provide some social bookmarking features. Any ideas as to how this budget was spent? In terms of actual functionality, £150k seems generous for a site like this.

    • Frankie Roberto 11:25 pm on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      The URL thing is COMPLETELY baffling. I can only suspect that there is some insane political reason behind it, with the people making the decision having no idea as to how the web works.

      I wonder which URL Google will consider the canonical one…

    • Tom Goskar 8:57 pm on 5 March, 2009 Permalink

      There’s a lot of passion behind this debate, that’s for sure :-)

      @Pete What have you proved? You’ve made a Google Co-op search for the 9 institutions websites (whole website, not specifically their collections). You’ve suggested people use disparate bookmarking tools to save them, or use disparate social networking sites to do the social bit? Sorry, try again :-)

      @Andrew But the site does do something, surely? I don’t really want to always be on the defence of CS, and there’s so much to this debate! The site seems to do something for me. I like the idea of the notebooks – it’s like a Tumblr style app in a museum/gallery space. Ticks a box for me. I like the groups idea. Maybe that’s too fluffy for some, but I think it’s a good idea. I just wish there were feeds for everything (and of course, an API).

      @Frankie Yes – the URLs are weird. I hope they sort that. It should be simple enough on a LAMP stack, but it looks Windows-ish to me.

  • Tom Goskar 8:57 pm on 3 March, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , interactive, , social media,   

    Creative Spaces – Social Media and Museums 

    [Update] I’ve had some more thoughts on Creative Spaces. Feel free to follow this post with my first follow-up.

    The National Museums Online Learning Project “Creative Spaces” is a social media project that links 9 major UK museums and galleries. Currently in beta, participating institutions include the Natural History Museum, The V&A, British Museum, Tate, National Portrait Gallery, Sir John Soane’s Museum, Royal Armouries, The Wallace Collection and the Imperial War Museum.

    Explore the beta of  Creative Spaces.

    creative-spaces

    Creative Spaces encourages visitor interaction:

    The site allows you to search all the collections at once, tag and store items in notebooks and groups, and upload your own images, videos and notes to share creative inspiration with others. This is a nonprofit, public sector project, and it’s the first time that national museums have collaborated in this way.

    Visitors can create a Creative Spaces account and make “notebooks” of their favourite objects by browsing the federated collections of the nine museums, and clicking “Save to” next to the object description. I was able to, for example, create a Notebook which I called “Iron Age goodies” and quickly add a few objects to it. Objects can be tagged, which is nice. If you don’t want to add an item to a group, you can simply add it to your favourites, perhaps to add to a notebook later.

    One of the nice things about Creative Spaces notebooks is the ability to add your own content. 

    creative-spaces-notebook

    This is the important bit for me. The ability to augment the museum-supplied content with my own photos, videos, links etc from my own visits is just lovely. A quick (but important) look in the site’s Terms & Conditions reveals that all copyright of contributed material remains with the creator, so no worries there. I will certainly contribute some of the photos and videos that I’ve taken, and I hope that many others do too. A nice touch is that your notebook page contains a social bookmarking widget allowing you or visitors to your notebook to easily add it to their bookmarking/social service of choice.

    Groups allow people to join special interest groups which can be public, public but with a membership approval process, or private. Anyone can create a group. It will be interesting to see how these are used, but at the time of writing it seems as if every group wants me to request an invitation to join, regardless if membership is open or not. But still, this is a beta, so I’m sure it will take a while to iron those bugs out (as a web developer myself, I know how tricky this can be).

    The site also contains videos produced by participating museums, so you can also see ‘official’ videos on different themes.

    Creative Spaces has a huge amount of potential, and it’s one of the few recent developments in the heritage sector that genuinely excites me. It has potential to allow people to interact with museums in a central place, and share the experiences they had during their visit. The federated search opens up the collections, and can even help to plan a visit, or conduct research from a distance. The notebook functionality can even be used to add links if users prefer to post content to their own sites. It’s a really good idea.

    Where could there be improvements? Having only used the site for a short while, here are a few suggestions:

    • Incorporate OpenID. I have so many accounts with websites, I don’t really want yet another username/password combination!
    • Create an advanced search form. Searching for Iron Age objects was hard.
    • Give me a nice URL for my page (http://bm.nmolp.org/creativespaces/?page=profile&uid=211). I’d like http://bm.nmolp.org/creativespaces/tomgoskar, for example.
    • Create a feed of status updates – it seems as if only the latest one is displayed.
    • Let us know if Museum staff will interact back with us. Or is the site going to be just for visitors to interact with each other? Will our content be accessioned back into the collections databases in any way?
    • Can I have an RSS feed for my notebook please :-)
    • It would be great to allow other users to add tags to my notebook entries.

    I also think that it is a great idea to provide this kind of experience for many museums in one place. Too many duplicate sites will mean too much dilution. I hope that other museums can come on board and add their collections as funding permits.

    All in all, it’s a great idea, well executed for a first version. It heralds a further change in the way that museums are perceived, opening them up, making them less stuffy, and allowing us mortals to engage and interact with their collections (and each other). All we need now is for the Creative Spaces website (when they are ready) to be widely publicised, as every social networking site needs an audience.

    I for one will be participating. See you on there.

     
    • Frankie Roberto 9:50 am on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      I don’t get it. What’s the point of the service? What need is it fulfilling?

      Looks just like yet another multi-institution lightbox application to me.

      ‘Creative Spaces’ – meh.

    • Tom Goskar 10:24 am on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      Hi Frankie,

      When Flickr came about, for example, it arose not from a need per se, but from an idea. Not everything needs to fix something, or fill a void. I’m in no way involved with Creative Spaces, and I think that it’s a great idea/experiment.

      I like the idea of a space where museum fans can go online after (or even during) a visit to collect items of interest together and contribute their own experiences.

      I like the Tumblr-esque experience of the notebook where videos, photos, links, audio, etc can be added. I’m all in to the idea of people interacting with museum/gallery objects and spaces. It could be fascinating to see how people experience them. It could be useful for museums to see what people are doing and saying.

      Like it or leave it, I suppose ;-)

    • Tom Goskar 10:25 am on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      …although I think that what the site is all about, and why people will want to use it could be improved upon.

    • Tom Goskar 10:31 am on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      This might do it:

      “Interact with museums and galleries. Upload your own experiences. Search the collections of 9 museums. Connect with like-minded people. Expand your visit online.”

    • Mike Ellis 11:42 am on 4 March, 2009 Permalink

      Hi Tom. I’m with Frankie here – my thoughts are on my blog: http://electronicmuseum.org.uk/2009/03/04/creative-spaces-justwhy/

  • Tom Goskar 9:52 am on 4 February, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: documentary, ,   

    Bringing President Lincoln “back to life” 

    Combining laser scans of casts of Lincoln’s ‘life mask’, with photogrammetric techniques, specialists in the USA have created a highly accurate-looking computer generated model of President Lincoln for a documentary entitled “Stealing Lincoln’s Body”. Using photographs, they have created highly detailed texture maps to make his face look as natural as possible.

    The documentary explores plots by a Chicago gang to steal his body in 1876. The clip below gives you a taste of how they have achieved this ambitious project.

    Read more on History’s (“History ™” is the new name for The History Channel…) Lincoln website.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel