<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Map Mobbing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/</link>
	<description>Where Past Meets Future</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geotags.org</title>
		<link>http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Geotags.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 01:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Map Mobbing...&lt;/strong&gt;

[Source:  Past Thinking] quoted: In the UK, most current mapping is all privately owned (by the Ordnance Survey - despite being a government department, and a number of others). Using it can be either expensive, or you tread dodgy ground by trying to m...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Map Mobbing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[Source:  Past Thinking] quoted: In the UK, most current mapping is all privately owned (by the Ordnance Survey - despite being a government department, and a number of others). Using it can be either expensive, or you tread dodgy ground by trying to m&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alligator Descartes</title>
		<link>http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Alligator Descartes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I had a similar thought last week regarding height data and handheld GPS devices. It'd be good to be able to derive decent ( /-5-10m accurate) height data at a better resolution than that supplied by the SRTM datasets. They're pretty good (for free), but not detailed enough at the city level. I hope the OSM guys put out the full 3D data and not just derived 2D plans...

That said, anything's good at this stage...

Another decent dataset worth looking at is the georeferenced Landsat imagery. It's quite detailed, but I'm not sure if it's good enough for city mapping again...

A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar thought last week regarding height data and handheld GPS devices. It&#8217;d be good to be able to derive decent ( /-5-10m accurate) height data at a better resolution than that supplied by the SRTM datasets. They&#8217;re pretty good (for free), but not detailed enough at the city level. I hope the OSM guys put out the full 3D data and not just derived 2D plans&#8230;</p>
<p>That said, anything&#8217;s good at this stage&#8230;</p>
<p>Another decent dataset worth looking at is the georeferenced Landsat imagery. It&#8217;s quite detailed, but I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s good enough for city mapping again&#8230;</p>
<p>A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCache &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeoCarnival #4</title>
		<link>http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>eCache &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeoCarnival #4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastthinking.com/blog/2006/04/20/map-mobbing/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] Oooo . . . this sounds like fun! Let&#8217;s hope this catches on around here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oooo . . . this sounds like fun! Let&#8217;s hope this catches on around here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.335 seconds -->
